co-employment

  • connect-1586220_640

No co-employment in SOW, done right

By |May 3rd, 2017|

Joint employment does not exist in a — properly managed-- SOW engagement because of the business-to--business nature of the transaction.
Comments Off on No co-employment in SOW, done right
  • earthquake-1665892_640

The ground is moving

By |March 29th, 2017|

In the world of work, two debates rage on: Who is a co-employer, and who is an independent contractor? The answers may be everyone and no one, respectively, writes Elizabeth Larson, an attorney with Michael Best and Friedrich LLC.
Comments Off on The ground is moving
  • social-media-1635574_640

Buyer and staffing firm still joint employers post project

By |September 14th, 2016|

The NLRB ruled a construction company and its staffing firm are joint employers — even though the projects for which the staffing firm provided workers were complete.
Comments Off on Buyer and staffing firm still joint employers post project
  • sad-597089_640

How to relieve your joint employment anxiety

By |August 17th, 2016|

Some government agencies have changed their rules to more easily find joint employment. Here are ways to mitigate your risk.
Comments Off on How to relieve your joint employment anxiety
  • MISC_blurclck

Co-employment is a fact of life, but tenure confusion prevails

By |May 18th, 2016|

Used for the right reasons they provide great benefits, but relying on assignment limits to mitigate co-employment risk is ineffective.
Comments Off on Co-employment is a fact of life, but tenure confusion prevails
  • ThinkstockPhotos-172587347

Drilling down into joint employer designations

By |February 3rd, 2016|

What you need to know about new guidance on how joint employment is established in cases brought under the the FLSA and Migrant and Seasonal Agricultural Worker Protection Act.
Comments Off on Drilling down into joint employer designations
  • ThinkstockPhotos-79301807

Tenure policies are legitimate, but not for mitigating co-employment

By |December 2nd, 2015|

Tenure policies have a legitimate role in the ongoing management of contingent workforce (CW) talent. That role can range from setting a point in time that engagement managers need to review the use of a specific CW talent in their business operations, to ensuring the satisfaction of the “long-term or multiple project” contingent worker talent.

When it […]

Comments Off on Tenure policies are legitimate, but not for mitigating co-employment
  • ThinkstockPhotos-480243917

Court: Temp can sue host company for discrimination

By |December 2nd, 2015|

The US Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit recently held that a temporary employee was an employee of both the staffing firm and host company, and therefore could bring a race discrimination claim against the host company under Title VII.

Comments Off on Court: Temp can sue host company for discrimination
  • Rare Earth

The ‘mythconception’ of tenure, co-employment risks

By |November 11th, 2015|

In Staffing Industry Analysts’ Certified Contingent Workforce Professional (CCWP) classes, certification candidates take part in a “myth and reality” activity around various co-employment mitigation and industry practices. One of those practices is using engagement tenure as a mitigation bulwark to guard against co-employment risks. At this week’s CCWP class in Las Vegas, the industry practice […]

Comments Off on The ‘mythconception’ of tenure, co-employment risks
  • US National Capitol

Legislators seek to undo NLRB ‘joint employer’ decision

By |September 16th, 2015|

Republican lawmakers last week introduced legislation to roll back the National Labor Relations Board’s decision that expanded the definition of joint employment, allowing a union to negotiate with a staffing buyer over both traditionally hired and staffing firm workers based on the client employer having indirect control over the workers.

The “Protecting Local Business Opportunity Act” […]

Comments Off on Legislators seek to undo NLRB ‘joint employer’ decision