There is a growing group of people who argue the use of the term “permanent” when speaking of staff employees is not only wrong, but could be risky, Editor and Publisher Subadhra R Sriram writes in The Staffing Stream.
What’s in a name?

Contingent Workforce Strategies 3.0 staff
Related Posts
AI or human? Determining which best suits your process steps
September 20th, 2023|Comments Off on AI or human? Determining which best suits your process stepsUncertainly brings opportunity: What’s ahead for the industry
September 20th, 2023|Comments Off on Uncertainly brings opportunity: What’s ahead for the industryHomeland Security proposes whistleblower and fees protections: H-2 program update
September 20th, 2023|Comments Off on Homeland Security proposes whistleblower and fees protections: H-2 program updateQantas violated Australian law in replacing ground crew with contractors
September 20th, 2023|Comments Off on Qantas violated Australian law in replacing ground crew with contractorsFastest-growing US staffing firms announced
September 20th, 2023|Comments Off on Fastest-growing US staffing firms announced