There is a growing group of people who argue the use of the term “permanent” when speaking of staff employees is not only wrong, but could be risky, Editor and Publisher Subadhra R Sriram writes in The Staffing Stream.
What’s in a name?

Contingent Workforce Strategies 3.0 staff
Related Posts
Silent value-killer: The importance of taxonomy to CW program success
March 15th, 2023|Comments Off on Silent value-killer: The importance of taxonomy to CW program successBuilding a customer satisfaction program
March 15th, 2023|Comments Off on Building a customer satisfaction programSilicon Valley Bank collapse: Inquire about suppliers’ institutions
March 15th, 2023|Comments Off on Silicon Valley Bank collapse: Inquire about suppliers’ institutionsAuto parts supplier to pay $1.3 million following temp worker’s death
March 15th, 2023|Comments Off on Auto parts supplier to pay $1.3 million following temp worker’s deathProp. 22: Appeals court rules firms can classify drivers as ICs
March 15th, 2023|Comments Off on Prop. 22: Appeals court rules firms can classify drivers as ICs